Gender Disparities in Healthcare Access

< Back

Region

Global

Values of Worthwhile Development

Equity
Justice
Inclusivity
Sustainability

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 3
SDG 5

Keywords

Gender disparities
healthcare access

medical testing
socioeconomic status
health literacy
institutional sexism

Description

This case study examines the systemic disparities faced by women in healthcare, highlighting critical areas such as representation in medical testing, access to care, and the socio-economic factors influencing health outcomes. Research indicates that women have historically been excluded from clinical trials, leading to a significant gap in medical knowledge regarding female patients. This exclusion compromises the effectiveness and safety of medical treatments designed for them. Additionally, women in lower socioeconomic groups, particularly in developing countries, face challenges due to inadequate healthcare resources, lack of health literacy, and limited access to education.

Resources used in this analysis include peer-reviewed articles, case studies, and reports from health organizations, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and research conducted by Barrett & Browne (1996, 1997). The findings illustrate the urgent need for policies that promote inclusivity and equity in healthcare to ensure all women receive the quality care they deserve.

Lessons Learned

  1. Inclusion in Research: The importance of including diverse populations in clinical trials to ensure that medical research accounts for gender differences in health and treatment responses.
  2. Education and Empowerment: Enhancing health literacy among women can lead to better health outcomes and improved engagement with healthcare systems.
  3. Policy Advocacy: Advocating for policy changes that mandate the inclusion of women and minorities in healthcare research can lead to more equitable healthcare practices.
  4. Addressing Socioeconomic Barriers: Understanding the socio-economic factors that restrict access to healthcare can inform the development of targeted interventions.
  5. Trust in Healthcare: Building trust between healthcare providers and women is crucial for improving care experiences and outcomes.

Case Study Evaluation

Holistic Approach

The need for a holistic approach to health that encompasses education, access, and socio-economic factors is emphasized, advocating for integrated strategies in development ethics.

Equality

The case study highlights the need for equitable representation in medical research and healthcare access for women, illustrating how systemic inequities affect health outcomes.

Human Rights

The evidence presented shows that women, especially those from marginalized backgrounds, are often denied fair treatment and resources in healthcare systems, necessitating a justice-oriented approach to policy reform.

Inclusivity

The focus on including women in clinical trials and health initiatives illustrates the importance of inclusivity in development practices, which should cater to all genders.

Agency and Empowerment

 Encouraging women’s participation in health-related decision-making processes can empower them and lead to better health policies and practices.

Responsibility

The case underscores the responsibility of healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers to ensure that women’s health needs are recognized and addressed in all areas of healthcare.

Sustainability

By addressing the root causes of gender disparities in healthcare, the case promotes sustainable health systems that benefit society as a whole.

Learn more about the Project Evaluation Tool